As a result of attending the Von Lintel gallery and seeing the work of Klea McKenna.
I am happier, not worrying about fibre base paper and its vagaries. When I saw the work of Klea hanging in the gallery, the warp and paper distortions took an a new kind of beauty for me that I have not been able to enjoy until that moment.
As the work hung on the wall, encased in its floating frame, the work took on a feeling of mystery and beauty that I had not seen in other photographs. (Klea does not actually photograph, she works with Ray-O-Graphs/Photograms a camera less method of making images. In her work she incorporates texture into the image, and by using a very thin single weight paper, which is very prone to curling, bending. Through forming she is able to record texture. Klea uses those “weaknesses” as strengths. It to give her images the texture it requires.
My interest is not physical textures, or photograms. I’m instersted in the obscure and unusal images, seen every day but go unnoticed. I do like using the camera and enlarger coupled with digital and making analogue prints. The paper vagaries of fibre have now been put to rest, thanks to Tarrah Von Lintel and seeing Klea’s work.
Dr. Wendy mentioned that I should start writing. I presume this is to stimulate the thought process and to manifest the ideas, words are tools of thought. Researching I come across the artist/photographer T. Pasha Turley, and in her work: Infrared with Verse.
She uses verse to help describe her images. She has a way with words that really stimulates me. I generally don’t like titles and captions that are too denotive. I prefer themes and connotations. I find the work of T. Pasha very stimualting in this arena. Her verse is ethereal and abstract and connotive, which I really enjoy and will apply to my own work.
So I printed a few images in the darkroom, This one below: Fig 1, was made on Ilford Multigrade Fiberbase Glossy Warmtone and I wrote my thoughts down at the bottom of the image as a stream of conciseness (automatic writing) I went to bed loving it, but woke up the next morning with a change of heart. It’s not the prose or the automatic writing, it’s the way I did it. I wrote directly on the paper with the image on it, (maybe the writing is too big) then it becomes too overpowering.
The words take away from the image, so I have decided to write a bit of prose, type it up, and have it alongside the image. Separate, thus giving them their own space. Words are images, albeit black squiggly lines on white paper, they are still images, and I just have to be careful the the writing does not over power the photographic image, which in my case I feel it did. I will do some more tests with seperatly typed cations/prose and see how it works.
I have to be careful though, Martha Rossler: ‘ The Bowery In Two Inadequate Descriptive Systems.”
did typed words next to the photographs. I’ve still some thinking to do about this. Im’ more prone at this point to give a little write up about the series at the head of the exhibition then let the audience fly with their thoughts, experiences, and perceptions.
Today, I made a call to the Fahey/Kline Gallery in Los Angeles. I had been there with the UCLA class (Contemporary Los Angeles Art: ART HIS-853.42) and had the opportunity to talk to the curator. He remembered me, as we had a brief chat about the financial state of photography sales. He had mentioned that the Gallery is doing very. This was a change from most of the other galleries that mentioned the fiancial climate of the photography is cool.
I am entertaining the thought of making my own prints for my exhibition, however I have a technical problem. I love the look of fibre base paper, but it is very difficult to get the photograph to dry flat once it has been washed. I have made my big murals 40×60 on resin coated paper and for that size, it works very well. There is an old joke I read somewhere and I will paraphrase: ‘If you can’t do it good, go big, if it’s still no good, go for color.” Something like that. I have to admit that the element “Big” does have an effect on the RC print. Somehow it looks very good as a mural [(40x60inches) so I do not need to go for color] but terrible as an 11×14.
I have tried most of the drying techniques for fibre, and none of them work well enough for me. I like a completely flat print. (Short of buying a Maco Ecomat professional drying press for about $1800.00) There is always a slight ripple to the paper, even when hinged, matted, or taped. The one method that works very well is is mounting the print onto a substarte. Either dry mounting onto acid free archival board, or on to some substrate like sintra, dibond or gatorfoam. However, once the print is mounted to any substrate, it is permanent. So my question to the curator was: “Is it acceptable to mount to a substrate, like dibond, sintra or acid free board?” I was assured that it is a very acceptable method and well accepted in the art market. Many of his clients dry mount, or secure to dibond.
This past week, I applied for the LAAA (Los Angeles Artists Association) membership. And was accepted on the 5 photographs I submitted. As a member I can submit to group shows they have and for one that is coming up in September the 14th. I am on the members list as Pierre Chehaly, they made an error, but I am thinking of keeping it that way as my artist name. I had to submit two pieces (Photos) and will see if I get into the group show. (COY) Will be notified by the 31st of this month, one week away. I then have a week to submit the prints. Due to lack of time I will have them printed by Weldon Color Lab. (they can print fibre) The problem is they are so far behind they may not be able to mount my work which needs to be in to the 6th of September. So I called and asked for some help on this. I will have to call next week to see what they can do. This will give me good practice for my own FMP show, dealing with problems like printing, mounting etc to make sure it gets done in time.
Tomorrow I have a get together for new members of the LAAA at the Gallery 825 in Los Angeles.
This will be for a meet and greet. After that I will join my UCLA class for studio visits for artists which takes place from about 12 till 4pm, where we will visit various artist studios in Los Angeles around the arts distrct.
Went to the meet and greet at the LAAAA. It was really nice to see and meet other artists in the Los Angeles area.
The membership was discussed, expectations and one has to donate 8hrs a year of ‘work’ painting, cleaning the gallery, however I think it is a nice way to get involved.
I am so glad that I had met Richard Bruland at the Hollywood Sculpture Garden, he recommended me to the LAAA, he is not a member himself anymore because he got represeantion as an artist at a gallery, so the job of the LAAA for him was done. However he is involved with the gallery and the current director.
Went of the Gallery/Artist Space tours this week-end with UCLA. Attended the Bendix Buiding in Downtown Los Angeles.
One of this places one hears about, but never anything more. I so glad to have signed up for this Art History class at UCLA, as I have managed to go to galleries, museums and art spaces I would never have gone to on my own. The biggest advantage so far, is to look at other artists work whi are still alive and working. Most of the big museums like the Broad, Tate, Pompidou, LACMA, MOMA, all the artists are gone, some for hundreds of years. The contemporary art scene is alive and well in Los Angeles, but hidden from the public eye.
I arrived late as I was at the LAAA meet and greet, but still in time to visit galleries: Durden and Ray, POST, Chateau Shatto and Von Lintel. What I really enjoy about this class is the oppotunity to tlk to artists forst hand, as well as the curators and people behind the scenes that one would not normally be able to have access to. The most enjoyable visit for this time around was the Von Lintel Gallery. This is run by Tarrah Von Lintel, and she has may wowks of art, both from painters and photographers on show. She is an amazing curator, very knowledgeable and passionate about every artist she represents. Each one is very talented, and their works stand out. It is though her that I overcame my dislike for the fibre base curl and warping. It’s amazing to see, with some artists it works, and some it does not. Another vlaubale lesson learned. Nothing is an absolute. (2+2 approaches 4) it does not = 4. I am finally getting to understand that logic. For my FMP, I have to gather ideas how to present my work, and the choices are staggering. One problem I am having is I would like to print mu own photographs on fibre base paper. However, getting these images to lay flat os very difficult because fiber base paper tends to warp and curl. The options are limited to dry mounting and putting onto a substrate such as Dibond or Sintra and the like, and I do not like either approach. At Von Lintel, Tarrah had an exhibit by the artist Klea McKenna, she makes large fibre base prints that are camera less. When I saw her work, suddenly something clicked in me. I like the way the images were presented in a floating frame. Somehow the bend and curl of the fibre base paper did not bother me, in fact I liked it very much. I like the way it looks when floating, and I will take this approach with my FMP. I am glad to have had the opportunity to see the work first hand, this can easily be missed when looking at the work on-line. So far, I am happy to be able to print my own work, and I will be looking into ordering some floating frames. I applied to the COY art call at LAAA. if I am accepted, I will do a test of my work in a floating frame, but so-far, I am very prone to going this route.
Did extensive dark room printing this week. I went down to Freestyle Photo, and bought some Fomabrom 112 11×14 paper, it is fiber base, matte, and double weight. It is between this paper and Ilford Multigrade Warm Tone for my work. I am slowly overcoming the worries of printing my own images. The mural workshop helped me with that. I am a pretty good printer, but the fibre base issue was a problem for me, however going to Von Lintel, talking to Tarrah, and seeing the work of Klea McKenna, has helped me to make the descision to print my own work.
I like high contrast images, still toying with the idea of matte or glossy, both have their plusses and minuses, my tendancy is to go with the matte Fomabrom 112, but that could change.
I have also been photographing images for my photo montages/constructions. I look for the disparate images now then put them together in post, or by double exposure in camera. I collect the disparate images and then synthesise it into the whole. So my new image “Idea” is a composite of three images. A tree, two watchful eyes and a lighting bolt, constructed and then printed.
Worked to-day constructing a few images from all the images I have collected photographing aover the module. Working at compositing the image some in camera and some in photoshop, but mostly the combination of the two. I like the advantage of shooting in film and working in digital then going back to analogue for the final product. This techniques was used in the film industry till it went all digital, so I have the advantage of knowing film as well as digital very well. I am very comfortable in both mediums. So I phtograph in both film and digital, I will be doing my FMP in B+W, so I’m using My Nikons F3 and F, Pentax67 and Hasselblad 501 and Ilford HP5+ and my Canon 5D and 7d for digital the 16mp and 22mp respectively is good enough to get a very big print. a 40×60 will be no problem.
I constructed a few images to day. Each image will take about a day to construct, if I have the elements. If not I have to go out and look for images. My stable now consists of Ravens, Stairs, Windows, Mirrors, Trees, Doors and I combine these images as the ideas come. I will be naking LVT’s from the files then printing them myself in the dark room. I did quite a bit of printing this week, wanted to do some more today but got too involved in making new images for this module and the FMP. I am pretty much st on pritning my own images from film, however it is very time consuming and very expensive, each LVT is about $70 and takes a week and is a 150mile drive there and back for me. I am using FomaBrom Fibre paper 11×14 and it also expensive between $50 and $80 for 25 sheets. I will definitely be making some 20x24inch prints, b ut this will be once I have my series completed.
Came to the realisation to-day, that I will abstract the fence out of my images, and will have very few representational images in the series. In fact I am at the point where I might abstract out ALL representation from the series. In one respect this will be great for me, as I have been teetering on the ‘Fence’ between representaion and abstraction since the beginning of the MA. But since my gallery visits and seeing other artists going for it, I may was well go all the way abstarct for the series. It will be based on what a fence connotes not what it denotes. Good art challenges me and pushed me to go further.
I started witing to-day, the words, associations, and some prose about fences. And I found out I can leave all denotation behind and only expound on the connotations a fence brings to mind.
Now that I have to print my own images, I am glad to have had the opportunity to have met Ansel and learned about darkroom technique. Ansel is probably one of the best analogue printers who has every lived his technnique was un-equaled. His mural prints were spectacular. There are very few photgrahers today who print their own work.